Kate: To prove real discrimination John Edwards was the best candidate between those three, they are running off of his ideas, his energies.

Euroman: If i follow your thinking, is if i vote hilary i vote for women.

Kate: No because Hillary isn’t making women’s rights an issue.
Obama is making civil rights an issue by identifying himself or letting the media pump him up as a Camelot holder; getting the Kennedys who are most closely related by JFK to side up for him.

Euroman: But simple thinking will mean the same too,

Kate: what do you mean? That women are voting for Hillary because she is a woman therefore they can understand her. That black people are voting for Obama because he is black and they can better understand him. That’s for sure.

Euroman: Women for Hillary, blacks for Obama.

Kate: We can prove more discrimination to Hillary. Men aren’t voting for Hillary. Seems if there wife is voting for her, they are not, what’s that about? Certainly not about Hillary.

Euroman: I agree.

Kate: That’s discrimination. White people are voting for Obama what is that? besides the couple tango. There are masses of young white students voting for him, harping on his every last breath.

Euroman: But that’s American basic mentality.

Kate: Black people are voting for Hilary what is that? Allegiance to Bill Clinton Civil Rights which is considerably more than JFK’s? Bill Clinton Civil Rights did not take away from the other races, or did it? Maybe after Reagan’s sledge hammer on women’s civil rights you just can’t feel any further damage anymore. In choosing who to support at the polls, the phone bank and the street, the only way I could separate out my discriminatory tendencies, is to look at what each candidate did in Congress and how they were attending to their Senate votes when on the campaign trail.

Euroman: The numbers count.

Kate: See how they behave to each other in the campaign. John Edwards lost lots there. It made no sense at all that he was hammering Hillary for things Barack was just as guilty of. It was a guy thing, hormones. Obama is an excuse maker in both his Senate records, never votes on anything iffy, squiffy. He is a whiner. Every time Clinton gets the edge on him. Clinton is solid. She just gets the edge on him, and keeps it there. Good for her. That’s how you do it, don’t stop talking and don’t let go.

Euroman: Whiner?

Kate: Complainer.

Euroman: ok

Kate: So how do you pick a president in France is it different from picking a president in Prague?

Euroman: Very different cause it’s not about money funds.

Kate: aha then we are back to John Edwards, a superior candidate to both Clinton and Obama; he’s our goodlooking visionary, brilliant defender. But Italy is definitely about money funds, are you sure that’s not true of Paris?

Euroman: It’s about speech and ideas more than attitude the communication is well under control.

Kate: Control, does the media decide your president, because that is who is controlling here; they sorted out the democratic race to the two who would challenge our prejudices.

Euroman: The world of media do a major part for sure, but with quite strict rules.

Kate: Do they do these tv debates? I guess because its free to the candidates they’d be a fool not to do it.

Euroman: Yes we tend to do that; but I didn’t follow last year presidential election
regarding French ones.

Kate: I wondered why Edwards did the TV, just as I wondered why he did the BIG money ethanol support, and of course his money is from advising BIG money.
You know I was thinking yesterday that Britain has more democracy than we do. Isn’t it that the two parties are constantly battling each other for control with no 4 year limitation?

Euroman: Media rules most of nowaday world.

Kate: I’ll have to educate myself on it, its only an observation.
So I guess that’s what a person has to do, build their media power.